Etika Bimbingan dan Konseling dalam Pendekatan Filsafat Ilmu
Abstract
ETHICS OF GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE APPROACH.
In philosophy view, ethic was a valueable and evaluation about a good and bad things in the human self. Ethic is also call moral philosophy as a apart of axiology in science philosophy. In every science has an axiology that purpose of utilization for prosperity of a human life. Guidance and counseling is a science full of values, that because of it’s a multidicipliner science. This based of four field guidance which of personal, learning, social and career. This field has make a counselor must understand and proficiency with sociology, antrophology, psychology, and eduation science. That will lead a counseling as multidicipliner science has a full of values to covering the process of counseling practice. However the axiology of counseling make little complex to discuss in philosophy foundation, also in psychology, sociology, antrophology and education. In this article will describe and discuss an ethics in counseling as a multidicipliner science in the view point of philosophy, psychology, and education. Also an ethics in counseling profession as applicative science.
References
Brammer, L., & Shostrom, E. (1982). Therapeutic psychology; Fundamental of counseling and psychotherapy. Fourth edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Burhanuddin. A. (2013). Etika keilmuwan. Retrieved May 20, 2017, from website: https://afidburhanuddin.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/etikakeilmuan_2013_1.pdf.
Craig, E. (Ed.). (1998). Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy: Vol. 1. London: Routledge.
McLeod, J. (2010). Pengantar konseling teori dan studi kasus (Trans.). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. (An introduction to counselling. Original work published 1993).
Naisaban, L. (2004). Para psikolog terkemuka dunia: Riwayat hidup, pokok pikiran, dan karya. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Rogers, C. R. (1962). The interpersonal relationship. Harvard Educational Review, 32(4), 416-429.
Oppenheimer, O. (1954). Some counseling theory: objectivity and subjectivity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1(3), 184-187.
Sharf, S. R. (2012). Theories of psychotherapy and counseling. 5th Edition. Belmont, USA: Brooks/Cole.
Sung, J., & Hanna, S. (1996). Factors related to risk tolerance. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 7, 11-19.
Suriasumantri, J. S. (1985). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Suriasumantri, J. S. (2009). Ilmu dalam perspektif. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Suseno, F. M. (1987). Etika dasar. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Sya’roni, M. (2014). Etika keilmuan: Sebuah kajian filsafat ilmu. Jurnal THEOLOGIA, 25(1), 245-270.
Wegmann, M. (2013). Philosophy and counseling: A case study. University of New Orleans.
Wilujeng, S. R. (2013). Filsafat, etika dan ilmu: Upaya memahami hakikat ilmu dalam konteks keindonesiaan. HUMANIKA, 17(1), 79-90.
Copyright (c) 2018 Alfaiz Faiz, Ari Dharmayanti, Nofrita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.