Efektivitas Metode Dialog Sokratik untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis
Studi Eksperimen terhadap Peserta Didik kelas XI IPS di SMA Negeri 1 Batujajar Tahun Pelajaran 2022-2023
Abstract
Critical thinking skills, is an important asset that students must have as a provision for dealing with technological developments and the effects of globalization in the era of disruption towards the era of society 5.0. One effort to develop students' critical thinking skills is through the socratic dialogue method. In general, this study aims to find out how the effectiveness of the socratic dialogue method can develop the critical thinking skills of students in class XI IPS at SMA Negeri 1 Batujajar in 2022-2023. The research approach uses a quantitative approach with experimental methods, non-equivalent control-group design. Sampling technique using non-probability homogenous sampling technique on 162 students of class XI IPS SMAN 1 Batujajar. Data collection uses a measuring tool in the form of a critical thinking skills test instrument. The results of the study show: (1) the profile of students' critical thinking skills is generally in the medium category; (2) the socratic dialogue method is effective for developing critical thinking skills; (3) all aspects of critical thinking skills experience a significant increase in value with the treatment of the socratic dialogue method.
References
Cleveland, J. (2015). Beyond Standardization: Fostering Critical Thinking in a Fourth Grade Classroom Through Comprehensive Socratic Circles. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Arizona State University.
Copeland, M. (2005). Socratic Circles: Fostering Critical and Creative Thinking. Stenhouse Publishers: Portland, MN.
Copeland, M, (2010). Socratic Circles: Fostering Critical and Creative Thinking. Stenhouse Publishers: Portland, MN.
Cobb, dkk. (1992). Characteristics of Classroom Mathematics Traditons: An Interactional Analysis. American Educational Journal, 29 p, 573-604.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (4 th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
Facione, P.A. 1990. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction – Executive Summary: The Delphy Report. California: The California Academic Press.[online]. Tersedia: http://assessment.aas.duke.edu/documents/Delphi_Report.pdf. 8 Januari 2019
Facione, P. A. (2000). The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill. Jurnal. 20 (1).
Facione, PA. (2010). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assesment. 1-24.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons LLC: Insight Assessment. [Online]. Tersedia www.insightassessment.com. 8 Januari 2022
Geertsen, H. R. (2003). Rethinking thinking about higher-level thinking. American Sociological Association, 31(1).
Gomes, F. D., Handarini, D. M., & Lasan, B. B. (2013). Efektivitas Metode Dialog Socrates Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta didik Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana UM. Malang: Tidak diterbitkan
Kemendikbud. (2013). Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Kemendikbud. (2018). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi: Program Kompetensi Peningkatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Zonasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Lightfoot, C., & Cole. (2013). The Development of Children (Seven Edt). London: Worth Publisher.
Maryam, S., Setawati, S., dan Ekasari, M. (2007). Buku Ajar Berpikir Kritis dalam Proses Keperawatan. Jakarta: EGC.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: what students know and can do - student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume 1, Revised Edition, February 2014). PISA: OECD Publishing.
Ormord, J., E. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan, Membantu Peserta didik Tumbuh dan Berkembang. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). The Miniature Guide To Critical Thinking ”Concepts & Tools”. The Foundation of Critical Thinking: California
Pratiwi, B. R. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Metode Socrates. Tesis Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Santrock, W. J. (2003). Remaja. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Santrock, W. J. (2011). Life-Span Development: Perkembangan Masa-Hidup. Edisi 13. Jilid 1. Alih Bahasa: Widyasinta Benedictine. Jakarta: Erlangga.
UNESCO. (2004). Training Guide and Training Technique. Bangkok: UNESCO and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.
UNESCO. (2012). Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow: Further Results from PISA 2000: UNESCO.
Zoller, U. (1999). Teaching tomorrow’s college science courses – Are we getting it right? Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(6), 409–414.
Copyright (c) 2023 Williya Novianti, Riesa Rismawati Siddik, Maya Masyita Suherman, Reza Pahlevi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
